Tuesday, June 18, 2013

The Art of Forgetting What It Is That I Am Supposed to be Doing.

I’m sitting here sipping coffee from a mug that I picked up at a gift shop a few years ago. I’m supposed to be writing a serious essay, one that I’m to submit next month, but I’m instead distracted by this coffee mug. The fact of the matter is I don’t quite remember buying it. The mug is worn-white and slightly discolored from years of holding various colors of various liquids from coffee to, on a couple of occasions, piña coladas. On the front of the mug, (if you are right-handed, which I am not, so I will say on the back) it shows a shark with its blood red maw agape. Next to the shark are the words “Send us more tourists. The last ones were delicious! FLORIDA.” I remember the reason for buying the mug; it was for my wife. We sort of collect coffee mugs and she’s sort of full-blown addicted to drinking coffee. Therefore I am an enabler, so what? 

Nonetheless, I don’t exactly remember where the mug came from, though I’ve narrowed it down to a gift shop located somewhere in the lower droop of Florida. And, of course, like every other non-event in my life this lack of a memory got me to thinking about other memories.

So, I’ve been told by some of my friends and relatives that reading my essays can be difficult at times, which is a commentary on my inability to express clearly that-which-I-am-trying-to-convey. In my defense, the sentiments that I feel are often inexpressible: to confine them within a system such as language would be to pollute them; it would be to do them a great disservice. So, in short, it will be my task in this essay to write clearly and to modify (and reject if necessary) my urge to unravel (or weave) the structure that imprisons such inexpressible ideas.

Here we go:

The blinking cursor is taunting me. Blink. Blink. Blink. It’s waiting for me to write something, anything, and I’m just sitting here sipping coffee from my discolored Florida shark-mug and counting the incessant blinks. 137 is as far as I got before I typed “The blinking cursor is taunting me”.


I’m thinking about television for some reason. I’m thinking about Steven King’s alien clown, Pennywise. I’m thinking about its dead lights, that horrid luminescent distraction causing an ancient and hypnotic stillness. I’m thinking about David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest and the similarity that must exist between the weapon and the dead lights. Distracters. Immobilizers.

Florida is known for Sharks. I learned this by watching the television. The mug that has so effortlessly distracted its possessor symbolizes this knowledge in at least two ways: 1) with an image of a shark in general, let alone one with a blood red mouth[1], and 2) with a facetious quip about a shark’s culinary turn-ons, that is, that humans, particularly the tourist version of humans, are “delicious.”

According to the television, sharks are capable of blood frenzied trances and tonic immobility. Most of us tourists know that sharks go crazy at the scent of blood. But tonic immobility? Just flip them over, bellies pointed toward the heavens, and they will become hypnotically still. The television says this in between commercials.

Blink. Blink. Blink. 43.

Various manifestations of the media unwillingly participate in the dialectic between parents and the purported cause of A.D.D/A.D.H.D., which, simply put, means that some parents blame their kid’s erratic behavior and strobe-light attention span on a collection of decadent byproducts of a progressing technological age, (T.V., video games, smart phones, et cetera). Various mediums are, on the one hand, merely expressions of technology. Such mediums, on the other hand, are being weaponized by hypercapitalism on the order of influence, further persuading mass culture to consume mass quantities (and qualities) of meaninglessness[2]. Not too serious now. Stay focused. No weaving, though in this[3] I am a willing participant. After all, I’ve seen sharks on television, and I’ve swam with them in virtual ocean video games. These are compelling distractions, so much so that I felt the need to no doubt overpay for a Florida shark-mug to remember the fact that I spent some iota of time playing with my smart phone in the state of Florida, which, according to the television, is known for sharks, which are known for blood-frenzied trances and tonic immobility, in other words, distractions, (which is not to say that the blood frenzied trance and tonic immobility as components of a shark’s instinct is not the antithesis of such a concept as distraction, for what is instinct if not the purest form of will?) but I cannot for the life of me remember precisely when or where in Florida I bought this symbolic mug.

Easy now.

On a side note, I hate revision.  I hate it because it shows its reviser how much time is wasted revising. You spend time writing, and then you spend time erasing what you’ve already spent a great deal of time writing. Though revision is necessary, it’s wasteful; it’s creation by deletion, by the destruction of those tiny little moments when you thought you were creating something permanent, permanence being the grandest of all illusions. There is no such thing as an ancient beach, only in concept is this symbol aged. Consider the relocative power of the ocean.Distractions come in waves. Magnificent ocean waves. 

So, speaking of waves, I lost a pair of my most treasured ten dollar sunglasses while swimming in Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. They fit my face in the most perfect of ways, these black and neon green plastic sunglasses, like an angel massaging my temples. As I was wading chest deep into a red flag of an ocean, no doubt catching the eye of the resort’s lifeguard on duty, a giant’s fist of a wave reared back, curled, fired, and caught me square on the cheek. The force of the wave knocked me off of my feet, nearly taking my bathing suit with it. My sunglasses and hat flew in two different directions and I, no longer perpendicular to the packed sand beneath the aforementioned ocean, struggled mightily to right myself.

I saw my hat immediately. It was headed for the beach, floating upside down dead-jellyfish-like towards piña coladas and their possessors, both things of which relied on teak furniture and thatched roofs for protection from the sand and the sun. It took me a few eternal seconds to find my footing and adjust my shorts. The sunlight was much brighter than it had been thirty seconds prior, which made the already turquoise ocean even more ridiculous. My glasses were gone. My wife, after hearing my plea for assistance in locating my favorite convenience store eye protection, tried to console me. She noted that I had just made a sacrifice to Poseidon. Clever though the statement certainly was, it was not clever enough to comfort my now soggy, exposed, and throbbing cabeza. Besides, sacrifice connotes at least somewhat willing participants, and I wasn’t willing. My wife, then, and in not so many words, intimated something to the effect of you were willing enough to risk losing them by swimming with them in the first place! I think she said this with her eyes, which was what distracted me in the “first place.” Her eyes are the first thing that I noticed about her about a decade ago and they still hypnotize me.

Yes, the previous sentence is as soggy as my hat was when I placed it back atop my crown, but it’s true. My point is that I was watching my wife’s face; she was exuding sheer joy while swimming in the ocean. So what can I say? I got distracted, and I lost my sunglasses as a result. I will say, however, that this is a memory that I will never forget, for 1) I’ve written it down, and 2) I bought a coffee mug with a ridiculous turquoise ocean on the back.




[1] In other words, the shark is a symbol which has imbedded within itself a distinct attractive quality (i.e., the color of the blood red mouth). Therefore, many associations are made as the bright colored maw catches the eye of a particular tourist, that is, me.
[2] See footnote “3”.
[3] See footnote “2”.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Writing for Publication: Intent Versus Content



I’ve recently heard or read somewhere a curmudgeon’s diatribe about the omnipresence of cathartic virtual devices at the disposal of the general public. Apparently this is a bad thing. The individual was expressing certain dissatisfaction with the concept of self-publication, blogging, vlogging, and virtual opining via social networks, et cetera. It’s the same tired complaint about FaceBook’s purported influence on and exercise of relativity and narcissism. Sure lots of people are on FaceBook, and sure lots of those people over-post banalities, bang out the most cliché of platitudes, and, more often than not, straight up projectile vomit linguistic stupidity, and sure some people use such a device as a means for social juxtaposition and posturing, but most of these people aren’t philosophers; they’re just people, picture-taking-people feeding the addiction of the picture-looking-people, the Dionysian dialectic of sadism and voyeurism. It’s ironic that I myself haven’t a FaceBook account, (primarily because of my contrarian nature and my vertiginous spite for some pop-culture conventions) but I do have a blog. 

I understand what the curmudgeon was getting at. The more avenues there are for any individual to voice his or her own opinion, plus the more individuals there are who are both willing and able to practice and engage in such an enterprise means the less potential importance and possible chance for recognition that a scholar or a critic in such a field might possibly obtain. If the market is flooded with ideas, both similar and oppositional, then the ability to navigate through them becomes exponentially difficult. The fact that an individual (both in concept and in flesh) is merely a grain of salt falling towards a great ocean only to be immediately dissolved is a scary one to grasp, especially for those who consider themselves serious philosophers. Relativity is frightening to Absolutes.

But over time the pain resides. The melodic waves massage you into a state of acceptance and contentment. Muscles relax. Mind resolves. Dissolution isn’t such a bad thing at all. Nothing has the potential to be the most beautiful Non-thing.

Jump in, the water’s fine, it’s just a bit murky.


I’m not certain exactly what I am trying to say here. In fact, I think this has turned into a sort of diatribe itself. Must be the curmudgeon in me.  Nevertheless, who really cares? This is my blog and I create my own truth here.